Mike found a few minutes to entertain my ramblings the other day on the phone. I've been folding over the idea of the current business model that the successful businesses in the world follow right now. I'll give my opening statement of disgust, the problems, the cycle of exacerbation, the downfall, and the solution. I will say, on a related note, that I've realized many of the ideas I've come up with as solutions to issues and problems in the world are impractical with the current mindset that plagues the human race at this point in history - but that's a whole other post.
Anyway, let's get back on track.
I saw this website
http://liekkisusi.wordpress.com/soapbox/unicru-assessment-guide/It evoked memories of when I applied for a job at Best Buy years ago in high school. Moreover, it really shocked me - or rather, I should say that it disgusted me. Like a flame under my mind, it started a convection current that mixed the ideas stewing in my head and brought them all to the top like rendered fat that I'd rather not include as part of my world. The issue concerns how our companies operate and whether or not morality and ethics have a place in the corporate world. Furthermore, whose ethics should the world follow? Of course, I would submit that following one's own ideals is ideal. However, since most people are often incapable of logical reasoning and being truthful even with themselves, it stands to reason that many people are unable to live morally sound lives using only their own rules and though processes. This, of course, is true, seeing as how we would not need laws, rules, and religious code if it were not. More to the point, I believe that the corporate world needs a serious a serious lesson in morality if it intends to survive at all in the coming future of our nation. And, obviously, it has proven itself incapable of coming up with its own set of rules by which to adhere.
Simply put, the corporate world has, for some time, devoid itself of any policies that are not enforced on it by the law and do nothing to help public image. In other words, if it's not illegal and nobody cares if it happens then it is sound corporate practice. The issue with that train of thought is that people don't necessarily know what is good and what is hurtful - this idea relates to the cycle I mentioned earlier, but I'll get to that in a moment. What caused this phenomenon? Surely the U.S. has had its share of philanthropists who are also captains of industry. Yet, a dangerous, new line of thought has become frighteningly popular among people in the U.S. That line of thinking is something like "who cares about tomorrow?" Tomorrow in this sense refers to the future in many senses including the future that is generally unrelated to the position of the speaker. Generally this includes the time after one's career, the time after one's death, and one's progeny. Adding to the problem is the increasing lack of regard for one's own offspring or the complete lack of desire to reproduce at all. Needless to say, this leads to a viewpoint in business ethics that equates to the term "like there's no tomorrow."
Along this line of thinking (or more accurately, lack thereof) very unsound business practices have been observed. Many employees find themselves without jobs after years of work and loyalty. Loyalty has no place in this zero-sum game played by executives and CEOs. Indeed, such phenomenon as off shore money laundering has been known to take place. Even loyalty to one's own country seems taboo among people who share this line of thought. Surely, then, if there can be no loyalty even to one's own country, there can be no loyalty to one's community or people. Companies may hold annual fund raisers or similar PR ploys to try and maintain their public image, but this slight of hand attempt merely confuses the casual onlooker and convinces them that no foul play is involved.
But then again, a company is all about profit, right? Why should a company exist if not to make a profit?
The former statement is perhaps the biggest problem facing our nation's economy right now. The problem with that line of thinking is that it removes the human element from the business. I assume that a very morally educated person will have already noticed the lack of the human element in the thought processes already presented, but this misconception about the reason for which we work is the most obvious. When a company becomes nothing more than a tool that transcends dreams and ideals, it becomes more machine-like than human-like in nature. The purpose of any organization should follow some sort of ideal. When a business is based on an ideal and reason, it allows the people within the company to work for a purpose: perhaps the most powerful motivating factor to humanity. It also allows workers to take pride in their work, knowing that their work is going to something greater than lining pockets with money. Money becomes far less important when one has a reason to exist beyond "stuff," but maybe I'm straying a bit far from the constitution on this one.
Back on topic, another pitfall here is the complete lack of accountability in businesses. The U.S. believes that it needs to have relaxed corporate policies in order to keep business from leaving, but that is a likely cause for a lot of this trouble. By allowing the corporation to exist in its current manifestation, we have allowed liability to fall on an arbitrary idea of an organization. However, all organizations are made of people, and people need to be held accountable for their actions.
We, as a world, don't really understand this problem yet because it's a product of globalization. Globalization is a new phenomenon that is allowing companies to become more powerful than nations. In this sort of neo-imperialist expansion of companies, people around the world are exploited inequitably. The entire venture is very dangerous. The government doesn't legally see companies this large as a monopoly, but these companies can more powerful and more devastating than any monopoly could. The government does not stop these companies from doing dealings in countries where work laws we have in place in the U.S. don't exist. There is no penalty for companies exporting their labor or dealing with countries who participate in child labor or lax working conditions. In fact, the World Trade Organization forbids us from doing such things.
I've only touched on the problems surrounding our system of companies and corporations, and yet we have the power to change things - sort of. We can do our best to eschew products from companies who don't follow basic moral guidelines and who don't treat their workers fairly, but it's hard to discriminate and it's often hard to tell where one's products come from. Furthermore, most people simply don't care. Of course, the apathy indirectly affects their life, but most people are too short sighted to understand interconnectivity and many others refuse to acknowledge its effect on them. It's all the blanket.
The solution? Well, we can change the way everyone thinks... but I know that even though I'm going to spend my entire life trying to do just that, it will take a long time and a lot of misery in order for the world to understand what we're doing wrong.
If this age of globalization is going to continue for humanity we need a stronger world government.
Also we need to start teaching ethics to our children (note: write this post)